teddywong
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit teddywong's Xanga Site!

Name: Teddy
Country: United States
State: California
Metro: Berkeley
Birthday: 5/24/1984


Message: message me
Website: visit my website
ICQ: 85336886


Member Since: 5/9/2004

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
JosephzZ
previous - random - next

AGCC
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Thursday, October 02, 2008

HAHA....the first application I ever made with my limited programming knowledge using VB!!!!!!!!
Single digit calculator!!!!! kakaka
...which only handle single digit input...hahaha...very low b........



Saturday, July 26, 2008

Source of the Origin

 I used to be an science student when I was at secondary school.
Somehow, to me , science = rejection of the possibility of supernatural events, and I did also believe without a doubt a that human is a just one of the product from some kind of chemical biological random selections, and those theories are supposed to be proved by those very intelligent and knowledgeable scientists. I didn't look any evidence regarding to those "theories" since you won't question about the existence of those historical persons when you are reading a history text book. (may be just me)

From now on, I should just believe what make sense to me....

Here is an interesting story:
A low b Teddy went into a BMW dealership. Teddy is very excited, and he is speaking to a very intelligent car dealer, whose name is Darwin MD PHD XYZ.
Teddy can't move his eye away from an BMW M III, and he started to generate a serious of questions from his low B brain.

T: Well, this car looks awesome, and I wonder " is the building process complicated?"
D :I am sure it is, otherwise, it won't deserve that price.

Then it comes to the second question,
T: Does that take a long time to build?
D: The evolution for human did take a long time, so as cars! This MIII comes from random selection. Don't you think it looks like your civic? They are from the same family tree!!! There is not market for those ugly cars. As a result, only nice car survive all ugly car got killed (discontinued). It is called Darwin Automobile Theory. According to the my theory, the current BMW MIII came from the evolution of car, which is 100% NATURAL process.

T: Wow, evolution of car sounds very scientific, sound good to me!! O wait...wait a minutes, natural process? by random probability?
D: ......yes very random and very natural......"week meat, strong eat"......
T: Anyways ......can you tell me more about the automobile history. Who build it?
D: ummm...according to Random Selection, the creation of the first car is created during an random collision of parts.....factory workers moved those parts randomly.......and you know what? it becomes our first car in our history!!

T: Wuhu~~~......Sounds very scientific to me!!!!
Teddy then looks at the the BMW again.
T: This car has lot of parts. I believe the first car in history may have less...but should be still a lot . How do they assemble? random process again?
D: yes!!! it's amazing, isn't it?

T: errrrrrr ging amazing....
Then Teddy take out a history text book called the bible of automobile, 
"In 1769, the very first self-propelled road vehicle was a military tractor invented by French engineer and mechanic, Nicolas Joseph Cugnot (1725 - 1804). " Automobile Genesis 1

T: why my history text book tells me a different story. There is an designer called Nicolas man! There should be a designer @ the first place.

wellll... A random process which generates a car, or a creator who designed a car?

Should I believe in Darwin? Does it still make sense.....?

Well..... my conclusion: A creator makes more sense to me hahahaha........


Thursday, May 08, 2008

Go Hybrid?

Oil Price reaches record high everyday.......
=>the economic value for a hybrid car also reaches a record high everyday

Goldman Sachs says $200 a barrel could be a reality in the not-too-distant future (shoot!)

MPG for a Toyota prius is about 47 =>1 mile =1/47= 0.02
MPG for a normal vehicle is around 25 =>1 mile = 1/25=0.04
so a Prius can save you about 50% of your $$ on gas

Assuming the current gas price is $4/gallon
Say you drive a non-prius 30 miles a day, you have to spend 30*7*0.04*$4=$34 a week, $136 a month.
Having a puris save you 68 dollar a month, 68*12=$816 a year
Assuming the oil future keep increasing to$200 per gallon in 2009
The growth rate is like (200-143)/143=40% next year and for simplicity,
we assuming it grow at 10% afterward (well little agressive), and the useful life for a Puris is 15yr.
Other Assumptions:
no inflation, same efficient for the puris and no alternate cheaper energy for the next 15 yr,the real discount rate = 6%, 0 residual value and we will be still alive for the next 15 years
We have:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
















Yr 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Growth Rate
40% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Savings $ from driving a puris 816 1,142 1,257 1,382 1,521 1,673 1,840 2,024 2,226 2,449 2,694 2,963 3,259 3,585 3,944
Discount factor 0.95 0.91 0.86 0.82 0.78 0.75 0.71 0.68 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.56 0.53 0.51 0.48
Present value of savings 777 1036 1086 1137 1191 1248 1308 1370 1435 1503 1575 1650 1729 1811 1897
NPV (sum of all savings)  $   20,753














Driving a Prius saves you $20,753 at present value point of view.......
The current price for a toyota 08 Prius is $21,100 and your instant saving is $20,753 in present value.
Say if you can borrow $21,100 at 6% to finance your puris, your out of pocket cost is only $21,100-$20,753=247...
Pay $247 dollar now.....and you not only get a brand new a prius but also able to hedge all your future gas cost for 15 years........sounds like a great deal

I used to believe that buying a car is never an investment but an expenses...coz it can only depreciate but never apreciate.......but buying a hybrid is different since it generates decent savings from the time you buy the car


Monday, April 28, 2008

Relationship Status Trend/Analysis on Facebook (by TD Wong)

In the past, it’s kind of difficult for people to measure how stable they can be when they are in a relationship because:

1)      there is no record

2)      nobody actually make an attempt to measure that

But now, we may make it possible by applying some concepts we learnt in finance.

What you have to do is:

-open a facebook account

-record changes in the relationship status and the date of changes.

It’s like checking the stock price and making a stock price chart.

And here is the curve you will probably come up with:

You will probably see different pattern of graph by looking at different couples.

Some couples are slightly more volatile, which means having more peaks and troughs in a short time frame.

Some couples may have a flat curve, which means they are stable all the time. (highly unlikely)

 We can calculate the standard deviation to measure how volatile the relationship is.

For long term Projects

We can even make an index for our relationship status, like a real stock market.

Here is an interesting project we can do.

1)      build an index for 500 couples to replicate the entire population regarding to their relationship status (S&P500 - well diversified porfolio)

2)      then we can measure the market relationship status change (marketing return), volatility, Status/Age ratio (P/E ratio), etc

3)      You can also regress your relationship status to the 500 index to see how risky is your relationship (relationship status Beta)

4)      See if US GDP and CPI do affect the change of relationship status (Macroeconomics Analysis)

5)   There may even exist some way for us to hedge our relationship status by creating derivatives, call and put options.

      6)   You can research the best girl./ boy friend by looking on their historical data or perform some
             analysis on your competitors or targets. (Equity Research and Forecasting)

       Ok…time to get back to work. If I see something like this on the facebook in the future, it will be very
        interesting.


 


Friday, February 01, 2008

I like this article from Forbes magazine. It utilizes what I learned as an Economics Major hahahaha....

In September an anonymous self-described "spectacularly beautiful" 25-year-old woman made it known on Craigslist that she wanted to snag a rich husband ("marriage only!"). She was soon transformed into a world-renowned gold digger when a sarcastic Wall Streeter responded to her post anonymously, using financial terms to prove that her beauty-for-money offer was a "crappy business deal." The sparring swiftly took on viral wings, rehashed on countless blogs and Web sites. How good is this guy's economics? Not great by our reckoning.

"In economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset."

While the woman's looks may indeed fade with time, her genes could deliver beauty dividends in perpetuity by way of any children produced with the Wall Streeter. A 2005 study found that attractive people tended to earn 5% more than their not-hot colleagues. Financially successful progeny could bode well for the Wall Streeter's retirement years.

"I was taught about efficient markets. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are, that the [rich husband] hasn't found you."

That's because, says economist Tyler Cowen, there isn't much of a market for beautiful young women seeking rich husbands. People tend to marry those with a common socioeconomic background. Therefore, a rich man would look for a woman with similar economic assets, who would also make a good wife and mother.

"A deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage. It doesn't make good sense to buy you, so I'd rather lease."

According to The Case for Marriage, published in 2002, married people are better off financially, healthier and happier than their single counterparts. This goes double for men, where numerous studies show that men who "buy" are happier and live longer than men who "lease."

"My income increases, but it is an absolutely certainty that you won't be getting any more beautiful. By 35, stick a fork in you!"

These days, with Botox, cosmetic fillers, plastic surgery and proper diet and exercise a woman is just getting started by 35. Doubtful even this arrogant Wall Streeter would stick a fork in Cameron Diaz (35), Jennifer Lopez (37), Jennifer Aniston (38), Julia Roberts(40), Halle Berry (41), Salma Hayek (41) or Demi Moore (44).




Next 5 >>